WE ARE NOW ALL VUCANS®
Module 1 – Uncertainty, Disruption, and Risk
12 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 2 – You’re Now a VUCAN®
15 Topics
RISK BASED PROBLEM SOLVING AND DECISION MAKING
Module 3 – VUCAN® Decision Making
13 Topics
Module 4 – Project Risk Management
8 Topics
RISK TAXONOMIES
Module 5 – What Is Risk?
16 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 6 – Risk Management
16 Topics
Module 7 – Risk Management Frameworks
20 Topics | 1 Quiz
ISO 31000 RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
Module 10 – Communicate and Consult (ISO 31000)
10 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 11 – Establish the Context (ISO 31000)
16 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 13 – Identify Risks (ISO 31000)
47 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 14 – Analyze Risks (ISO 31000)
26 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 15 – Evaluate Risks (ISO 31000)
45 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 16 – Accept Risks (ISO 31000)
12 Topics
Module 17 – Treat Risks (ISO 31000)
30 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 18 – Record and Report Risks (ISO 31000)
16 Topics | 1 Quiz
Module 19 – Monitor and Review RMF (ISO 31000)
14 Topics | 1 Quiz
Video: What is a Heat Map: Analyzing Risks? (5)
Why This Matters: Risk has to be operationalized. So, risk is defined as likelihood x consequence in a qualitative graph. Is this approach reliable? There is still uncertainty in the decision. But remember, most decisions under uncertainty are fuzzy. For most contexts, qualitative decision is ‘good enough.’
Project Question: Why do you think that the qualitative approach to RBPS and RBDM is ‘good enough?’